Continued from above.
The thing was that I was trying to clear the air between her and me.... And it's also possible that I wasn't tactful enough with her? I should've focused more on myself and my concerns rather than on trying to ask her or to get her to admit she was gay...! I realize that now.... Before the hearing she never wanted to admit she was gay and even wanted to deny it.... (And she was under psychiatric care, which I have proof of.)
When I went to the hearing, I hadn't processed my thoughts well enough because I'd had hardly any experience in dealing with gay people...and hardly any experience in the courts.... So, I didn't really think about what I was saying and how it sounded.
To recap, the transcripts show that the adjudicator was debating against me partly because he wasn't trained in sexual harassment and partly because I spoke of my landlady's sexual orientation. And it wasn't really about me teasing him or what happened afterward.... I spoke incorrectly of my landlady...and therefore, I want to disqualify myself from prosecuting my landlord/tenant case--which I'm saying retrospectively.... I had a "learning experience" and the experience just got a little bigger!
Again, as far as the teasing went, I don't even want it to be an issue.... And I'll update my Waterlily blogs, as needed and as I can....
Continued below.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment