In the past, I've heard stories that some police and Hollywood people wanted to have a RESPECTABLE conclusion to the special police project for LGBTQs. I don't know if these people are around any longer but I've appreciated their view and have wanted to support it. It's been a little difficult, however... unfortunately. But leaving that aside, I'd like us to be CIVILIZED....
We have a fancy new, human rights museum in the city of Winnipeg, in Manitoba. There've been stories that the police project wanted to have a news conference and/or a display there.... Would it be fair to say that our main spokesman needs to be a CIVILIZED person...??? And if a person has been an antagonistic or aggressive "provoker," rather than a "messenger of peace," is it a civilized wish for them to be the spokesman?
Myself, I've been accused of not having clear thinking at times.... But I wonder if the police and their associates are always thinking clearly...? Okay, it's just my opinion.... Just my opinion.
[It's possible someone had a respectable career in the past...and that's fine and good. But if they've spent the last 20+ years being a "provoker," would it be civilized or respectable for them to be placed as the spokesman...?]
One other point is that maybe some people have wanted a "roadblock" to be the punchline--the bottom line--of the special police project...?
No comments:
Post a Comment