I Was Partially Incorrect

Continuing from the very first blog post, and the notes added on January 8 and January 24, 2013:  The way that my politically-incorrect comments came across was a little more serious than I realized.  Basically what happened was that I called my landlady gay without her permission to do so.--And it also seemed that I was being nosy and/or accusing her for being gay.  But as I've indicated, I wasn't saying what I really meant to say.  There was more to the story--and the law--than what I was able to express adequately at the hearing.  Also, it's possible my landlady wasn't guilty of sexual harassment but that she discriminated against me on the basis of my sexual orientation which was different from hers.  I was straight and she was gay.  And that's not the way we usually hear of discrimination cases going--usually it's straight people discriminating against the minority which are gay.  But the reverse is also possible; and maybe that's why my case has been so complicated!  [Have been discussing this matter with my official sources and we're continuing.--We're not quite done yet.]  Will update my blog further when I have time.--Don't have internet service at home and am limited to use at the libraries.  [I also have to spend time with my official writing which goes out to my sources.] ******  A past prime minister of Canada, Pierre Trudeau, had made a comment something like, "The government has no business in the bedrooms of the nation."  And I believe it was a valid point.  An argument like this was made at my hearing and if we had stopped there, the case might've been different!  And I really want to emphasize that I don't disagree with this idea.  But my case went a lot further and maybe we'll get to a conclusion yet--as far as discussing the matter goes.  [Have stated I'm not trying to prosecute my landlady any longer.]