Note about Labels, added in February 2023: Some posts under the New Insight Label have been deleted earlier. Would prefer to delete the New Insight Label from my blog but the blog site isn't allowing me to make changes to the Labels any longer--unless I delete the posts individually and permanently. Would like to keep the remaining posts under this Label for now...but the New Insight Label is no longer significant, as far as I'm concerned. The Doc Hollywood Label is still relevant.
One thing about the original "Doc Hollywood" whom I've been writing about is that he seems to have been employed by hospitals, universities, and government agencies.--All he has had to do was to pick up his paychecks, rather than computing all the financial figures and paperwork in his own practise!? He hasn't had to use very much business information, that is! As for an understanding of law???--No, no, no! Sometimes I've heard he has complained about other parties--and legal and business knowledge would've helped! But people didn't know how to do better--even though there have been a number of lawyers involved [somewhere]. *** The police have been allowed to give out information and "evidence" without any kind of accountability in a court system. In court, there would be many processes and rules about sharing evidence--giving the other party a chance to respond; examining witnesses; and having judges make rulings, etc. And the police "evidence" has gone straight to film/TV people! It's a "can of worms," if there ever was one.--Nevertheless, I haven't asked others to speak on my behalf, if matters concerned me, and I didn't ask anyone to take actions for me without consulting me. [We'll sort things out, in other words. And I've been answering the most important issues in this blog, to the best of my ability.]
No comments:
Post a Comment